Consider Why You’re Homeschooling

I’m reading my fresh-off-the-press copy of Karen Glass’ excellent Consider This – now with introduction by David Hicks. It’s brief, concise, easy-to-read, and cuts straight to the point. I love it.

Classical education is about wisdom-loving, not knowledge-gathering

As I’ve written before, the goal of education is virtue, and Karen’s first chapter jumps right into the heart of it. She proves that virtue – right acting – needs to be the end we are pursuing when we educate children (and also ourselves), and demonstrates this is the classical notion about what education is for.

why-homeschool

I would go farther to say that if that’s not why you’re educating, then you aren’t educating classically, no matter how many chants you do or how much Latin you know. And if you’re educating for that reason, but doing it without Latin or memorization, you still have more in common with the stream of classical education than the latter.

It’s a huge part of the point in Norms and Nobility, and Karen deftly shows that Plato & Aristotle held that education is leading a child into virtue, that Christianity expanded on that goal, and that Charlotte Mason was holding onto that long-held aim at the time when Modernity was gaining the cultural upper-hand.

All areas of life were brought into service for this single goal – to teach children to think and act rightly.

I love this succinct statement of the historic perspective on education’s aim.

Yes, we pursue knowledge, but not simply for its own sake. Our aim when we are learning and loving knowledge needs to be acting in accordance with the truth we have discovered – wisdom being knowledge, rightly applied.

When our knowledge is transformed into action, it becomes virtue, and virtue was the goal of education.

Or, as James puts it,

But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves.

classical-education

Whereas Plato and Aristotle held up philosophy as the highest and best source of knowledge for wisdom and virtue, Christendom took philosophy all the way to its end: religion and the embodiment of wisdom and virtue, Christ Himself.

She also quotes from Erasmus, who stated four goals of education:

  1. implanting seeds of piety
  2. cultivating a love for and knowledge of the liberal arts
  3. instructing in duties of life
  4. training in good manners

This is a full-orbed education. It is so much more than the 3-Rs.

It is nothing less than a full life, well lived – not compartmentalized and neutralized. Really, nothing is outside its scope. This is paideia – a one-piece life lived to enculturate and saturate our children (and ourselves!) with truth, goodness, and beauty.

My Book Bag

I gave up on Nicolas Nickleby and replaced it with The Little Way of Ruthie Leming, even though it’s not fiction.

Get more great quotes & recommendations at ladydusk’s Wednesday with Words!

10 Responses

  1. kortney
    |

    Could you point me toward more resources on paideia? What it is, how it works?

    Also, three cheers for Erasmus!

    • Mystie Winckler
      |

      Well, there’s always wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paideia :)

      I learned about the concept from Doug Wilson ACCS conference talks and also his book, The Paideia of God: http://amzn.to/10AA1U6

      paideia is the word Paul uses in the phrase “bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.” It means enculturation – it is shaping that is more than academic, but holistic – all of life – nothing neutral.

  2. Annette Whipple
    |

    So true! We all need to have more wisdom, not knowledge.

  3. ladydusk
    |

    So, so good. It really brings the focus back to the teacher, am I acting rightly? Thanks, Mystie!

    I really liked The Little Way of Ruthie Leming, I hope you enjoy it!

    • Mystie Winckler
      |

      I’m reading it because you recommended it so highly! :) I’m really enjoying it so far.

      • ladydusk
        |

        I’m so glad; book recommendations are a nerve-wracking thing. I’d hate to make someone waste their time!

        • Claire
          |

          I’m not Mystie, but I think even if you didn’t like a book that was recommended highly by someone you respect, starting it and figuring out why you don’t like it would probably be a worthwhile pursuit – reading a recommended book could never, I think, be a waste of time.

        • Mystie Winckler
          |

          That’s very true, Claire!

  4. […] if we look at principles rather than methods, then I think we will find many of those different voices agreeing more than not. And, if we […]

  5. […] Mystie Winkler at Simply Convivial: “It’s brief, concise, easy-to-read, and cuts straight to the point. I love it.” Read the full review. […]